The Post of Honour rules are by Keith Flint who is also the author of the Honours of War rules published by Osprey. Both sets of rules are for the Seven Years War – 1756-63. The rules are supported by an excellent honoursofwar.com http://honoursofwar.com/ forum which contains modifications for fighting the War of Spanish Succession (WSS), War of Austrian Succession (WAS) and others around that period sometimes called the lace wars.
I fought the battle solo, due to lockdown and found the
rules easy to read and remember. Having previously
used the HoW rules was an advantage as the
command and control and / manoeuvre rules are similar.
The turn sequence starts with alternative movement phases
but then has simultaneous firing and melee phases. On the whole, this worked fine. I’d suggest that firing is calculated in groups of units for both sides rather than all of one side and then all of the other, by
which I mean Austrian battalion "A" shooting at Prussian Battalion "B" and then the
reverse, rather than all of the Austrians then all of the Prussians. This
helps when you are trying to remember whether a battalion was weakened before this round of firing or during it.
Units can take a number of hits before they are weakened and
take penalties in their firing and melee.
After further hits units are destroyed.
The rallying rules are very important.
Having reserves who can march forward past the 1st line to “shelter”
them and allow them to rally, is key to success.
In retrospect Mollwitz may not have been the idea battle to
test the rules as I halved all movement distances in order to simulate the 2’
deep snow on the ground that April. (Mollwitz is in modern day Poland and it
was a cold year.) The half speed
movement increased the effectiveness of firing as troops could only approach to charge
range slowly. This was awkward for
cavalry who were unable to change from outside of musket range and had to take
twice as much fire when charging infantry.
The Battle
The left flank of the battle field has two small river and
three small villages. In the actual
battle everything was under 2’ of snow.
Some of the buildings
The Prussian forces were squashed on the plain with small
cavalry forces on each flank. Two gun
batteries were situated before the battle lines. One feature I like about the PoH rules is the
pre-battle bombardment phase.
The battle started with the Austrian right wing moving on the flank of the Prussian line. In retrospect with the slower movement they
would have been better off just going straight ahead at the Prussians as they
had both a numerical and quality advantage.
Flanking Austrians
The Austrian left and Prussian right wings clashed in a mass
cavalry brawl. The Prussian Carabiniers were
lead by the king himself. (As per the actual battle.) True to the real battle the Austrian cavalry whipped
the Prussians and Frederick had to retire to the infantry.
In the actual battle the two Prussian grenadier battalions
formed square. The PoH rules seemed to
lack this ability.
A four way cavalry fight. (Quite easy to calculate)
The two battle lines slowly closed on one another while the Prussian
grenadiers on the right flank held off
the Austrian cavalry.
The Infantry advantage lay with the Prussians in both quality and quantity.
The Austrian battle line broke, just as they did in 1741 and
the battle was lost. The Austrian
cavalry had won both wings but were unable to swing the battle in the favour of
Austria.
I fond the Post of Honour rules gave a reasonably quick battle;
a nice period feel and gave a historically accurate result. (To be fair I’d have been very worried if the
Prussians had lost. They had over 50%
superiority in infantry who were better equipped and trained than the Austrians.
Nice report. I like your table and hope to see more.
ReplyDeleteVery good report! Having fought Mollwitz several times with HoW, the battle played out similarly in every instance. In one game, the Austrians came very close to pushing the Prussians to the breaking point. Close but not quite.
ReplyDelete